首页> 外文OA文献 >SDHB/SDHA immunohistochemistry in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: a multicenter interobserver variation analysis using virtual microscopy: a Multinational Study of the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors (ENS@T).
【2h】

SDHB/SDHA immunohistochemistry in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: a multicenter interobserver variation analysis using virtual microscopy: a Multinational Study of the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors (ENS@T).

机译:嗜铬细胞瘤和副神经节瘤中的SDHB / SDHA免疫组织化学:使用虚拟显微镜的多中心观察者间变异分析:欧洲肾上腺肿瘤研究网络(ENS @ T)的多国研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite the established role of SDHB/SDHA immunohistochemistry as a valuable tool to identify patients at risk for familial succinate dehydrogenase-related pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndromes, the reproducibility of the assessment methods has not as yet been determined. The aim of this study was to investigate interobserver variability among seven expert endocrine pathologists using a web-based virtual microscopy approach in a large multicenter pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma cohort (n=351): (1) 73 SDH mutated, (2) 105 non-SDH mutated, (3) 128 samples without identified SDH-x mutations, and (4) 45 with incomplete SDH molecular genetic analysis. Substantial agreement among all the reviewers was observed either with a two-tiered classification (SDHB κ=0.7338; SDHA κ=0.6707) or a three-tiered classification approach (SDHB κ=0.6543; SDHA κ=0.7516). Consensus was achieved in 315 cases (89.74%) for SDHB immunohistochemistry and in 348 cases (99.15%) for SDHA immunohistochemistry. Among the concordant cases, 62 of 69 (~90%) SDHB-/C-/D-/AF2-mutated cases displayed SDHB immunonegativity and SDHA immunopositivity, 3 of 4 (75%) with SDHA mutations showed loss of SDHA/SDHB protein expression, whereas 98 of 105 (93%) non-SDH-x-mutated counterparts demonstrated retention of SDHA/SDHB protein expression. Two SDHD-mutated extra-adrenal paragangliomas were scored as SDHB immunopositive, whereas 9 of 128 (7%) tumors without identified SDH-x mutations, 6 of 37 (~16%) VHL-mutated, as well as 1 of 21 (~5%) NF1-mutated tumors were evaluated as SDHB immunonegative. Although 14 out of those 16 SDHB-immunonegative cases were nonmetastatic, an overall significant correlation between SDHB immunonegativity and malignancy was observed (P=0.00019). We conclude that SDHB/SDHA immunohistochemistry is a reliable tool to identify patients with SDH-x mutations with an additional value in the assessment of genetic variants of unknown significance. If SDH molecular genetic analysis fails to detect a mutation in SDHB-immunonegative tumor, SDHC promoter methylation and/or VHL/NF1 testing with the use of targeted next-generation sequencing is advisable.
机译:尽管SDHB / SDHA免疫组织化学作为确定家族性琥珀酸脱氢酶相关嗜铬细胞瘤/副神经节瘤风险的有价值的工具已确立作用,但评估方法的可重复性尚未确定。这项研究的目的是在大型多中心嗜铬细胞瘤/副神经节瘤队列(n = 351)中,使用基于网络的虚拟显微镜方法研究七名专家内分泌病理学家之间的观察者间差异:(1)73个SDH突变,(2)105个非SDH突变,(3)128个未发现SDH-x突变的样品,(4)45个未完成SDH分子遗传分析的样品。在两级分类中(SDHBκ= 0.7338; SDHAκ= 0.6707)或三层分类法(SDHBκ= 0.6543; SDHAκ= 0.7516),所有审阅者之间都达成了实质性共识。 SDHB免疫组化的315例(89.74%)和SDHA免疫组化的348例(99.15%)达成了共识。在一致病例中,在69个(〜90%)SDHB- / C- / D- / AF2突变病例中,有62个显示SDHB免疫阴性和SDHA免疫阳性,其中4个中有3个(75%)的SDHA突变显示SDHA / SDHB蛋白丢失105个非SDH-x突变的对应物中有98个(93%)表现出SDHA / SDHB蛋白表达的保留。两个SDHD突变的肾上腺旁神经节瘤被评为SDHB免疫阳性,而128个肿瘤中有9个(7%)没有发现SDH-x突变,VHL突变中有6个(37%(〜16%)),以及21个中有1个(〜 5%)NF1突变的肿瘤被评估为SDHB免疫阴性。尽管在这16例SDHB免疫阴性病例中有14例是非转移性的,但观察到SDHB免疫阴性与恶性肿瘤之间的总体显着相关性(P = 0.00019)。我们得出结论,SDHB / SDHA免疫组织化学是鉴定具有SDH-x突变的患者的可靠工具,在评估未知意义的遗传变异中具有附加价值。如果SDH分子遗传分析未能检测到SDHB免疫阴性肿瘤中的突变,则建议使用靶向下一代测序对SDHC启动子进行甲基化和/或VHL / NF1检测。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号